Speller Test Results for: «sp-regression-hu-smj.txt»
Overview
Technical data
Language tested: smj
Document tested: sp-regression-hu-smj.txt
Speller tool: Hunspell, command line version
Speller tool version: @(#) International Ispell Version 3.2.06 (but really Hunspell 1.3.2)
Speller lexicon version: Julevsámi 1.0beta9-2011-03-18
Test Date: 20111109-2013
Test Type: regression
Processing time (user+system time): No data available
Speed: No data available
Max memory usage of the speller (max value of /bin/ps -o rss= PID sampled every 10 second): No data available
Result summary
Nº of input words: 14
Nº of spelling errors: 7 (50,0% of all words)
| Speller view | Wrong tokenisation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speller Positive (Nº of flagged words): 7 | Speller Negative (Nº of accepted words): 7 | All tokenisation errors: 0 |
||
| Reality | Nº of real errors: 7 | Nº of true positives (detected real errors): 7 | Nº of false negatives (unflagged spelling errors): 0 | Nº of errouneously tokenized spelling errors: 0 |
| Nº of real correct words: 7 | Nº of false positives (incorrectly flagged words): 0 | Nº of true negatives (unflagged correct words): 7 | Nº of errouneously tokenized correct words: 0 |
|
Precision (tp/(tp+fp)):
100,0%
Recall (tp/(tp+fn)):
100,0%
Accuracy ((tp+tn)/words):
100,0%
| Spelling errors: 7 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple errors (edit dist. 1): | Errors with edit distance 2: | Errors with edit distance ≥3: |
||
| Suggestion statistics for true positives (= 7 = 100%): | 7 (100,0%) | 0 (0,0%) | 0 (0,0%) | |
| Nº of detected spelling errors with correct suggestion in top 3: | 7 (100 %) | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Nº of detected spelling errors with correct suggestionbelow top 3: | 0 (0 %) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nº of detected spelling errors with only wrong suggestions: | 0 (0 %) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nº of detected spelling errors with no suggestions at all: | 0 (0 %) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Undetected spelling errors: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
True positives (7)
Spelling errors with correct suggestions (7)
| Input word | Expected correction | Editing distance | Suggestions | Bug ID | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ii | i | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
| iiv | iv | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
| iij | ij | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
| eep | ep | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
| ee | e | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
| ejjma | ejma | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
| itjiv | ittjiv | 1 |
| 778 | Negation verb missing |
True negatives (7)
The correctly accepted words are listed here for easy copy&paste into Word to quick check regressions in new versions of the speller: No correctly spelled words accepted by an earlier speller should be rejected by later spellers. To check, just copy and paste these words to Word, and see if you get any red underlines. Duplicate words are not repeated, unless one is followed by some punctuation. The words are reverse sorted according to Unicode character code.
iv ittjiv ij i ep ejma e
Grouped by bug #
| Input word | Expected correction | Editing distance | Suggestions | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iv | Negation verb missing | |||
| i | Negation verb missing | |||
| ij | Negation verb missing | |||
| ep | Negation verb missing | |||
| e | Negation verb missing | |||
| ejma | Negation verb missing | |||
| ittjiv | Negation verb missing | |||
| iiv | iv | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |
| ii | i | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |
| iij | ij | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |
| eep | ep | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |
| ee | e | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |
| ejjma | ejma | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |
| itjiv | ittjiv | 1 |
| Negation verb missing |